Monday, 13 July 2009

First draft

What I am trying to achieve

In my report there are going to be a few questions that I would like to cover based around the question “ Does sex sell”. This is a very big topic to cover so I am going to back it down focusing on the advertising they use to sell magazines. Some of the question I am going to try to cover is, why do designers use sexual images to get their message across? Where did the search for a perfect world come from? I have based this question on the fact people use sex appeal to increase the effectiveness of an ad or commercial because it attracts the customer’s attention.

I am going to do different experiments comparing a women magazine to a men magazine.
• Cosmopolitan Vs Nuts
• How many articles about sex does cosmo have compare to nuts
• How many sexual images do they both use
• Why are sexual images of women more popular then men images

Chapters

• Advertisers tried to understand and explore the deep unconscious and subconscious factors that motivate people to buy products. Advertisers try to use word triggers and picture trigger to evoke desired responses. I am going to explore what Images makes people buy particular products.

“The business man’s hunt for sale boosters is leading him into a strange wilderness: the sub-conscious mind.” (Wall street Journal, page 1)

Designers use sexual images as one of their tactics to attract men and to twist their minds into purchasing a particular product. Companies are implementing the same tactics in the advertisements that target women by sending out the message of "Buy (this product) and he will notice you".

• WHS Smith a family company starts Playboy stationary and Aero chocolate start using model best known for their sex scene are they using sex to enticed people, so has the media won. Great advertisers consider not only the attention-getting power of an advertisement or commercial, but also what kind of emotional response it provokes in customers. I want to look back in history on when sexual images become an everyday and look at a time when it was not ok to look at sexual images.

Studies show that the attractiveness of the endorsing model provokes positive responses. Nudity and graphic erotic content, while still increasing consumer’s attention, doesn’t really generate positive feelings among viewers but that was not the case 40’s year ago. The media has changed so much over the years, in the late 60’s women in magazine weren’t used as sexual objects but instead their lifestyle of motherhood and the care of the home and husband were splashed over the magazine covers.
• I want the opinions of women who work in that industry on the way women are portrayed in the magazine world.
• When did women magazine moved away for looking a women as mother images to sexual desires?

Betty Friedan an American writer, activist and feminist wrote for a magazine company call Mc Calls, which in the late thirties portrayed women as autonomous heroines seeking to fulfill their own goals but as the forties progressed, the self-sufficient heroine gave way to the glorified housewife, praised. The magazine was aimed to bring women "into the mainstream of American society now". Friedan work looks for the social definition of women’s role in the pages of women’s magazines, she saw the portrayals of women both editorial and advertising. Courtney and Lockerets were another two people who analyze how people looked at women, they believed that there are four general stereotypes of women being shown in the 70’s in print advertisement:

“ A women’s place is in the home; women do not make important decisions or do important things; women are dependent and need men’s protection; and men regard women primarily as sexual objects”

¬¬ Pingree, Hawkins, Butler and Paisley developed a scale for sexism and tested it against advertisements during the 1973-1974.

“ The most stereotypical level, level one, shows women as sex objects. Level two keeps women in their places by showing them in traditional activities. Level three shows professional women whose first place is in the home. Level four shows the sexes as fully equal and level five shows men and women in individual, nonstereotyed roles”.


• I want to look if using sexual images and talking about sexual issues a bad thing.
It’s human nature to be curious about sex. People in advertising say that all they do is hold a mirror up to society, reflecting who we are. So is it a surprise that most of the advert we see has a sexual nature about them. People portray porn as an ugly thing, so with that they show them in a ugly, cheap way with poor lighting and harsh settings but what if you take out of that setting and place in a beautiful setting with beautiful people ,what do you what do you get, I can tell you an ADVERTISING. Sex in advertising has stirred controversy for many years, an advertiser must be careful when incorporating it in a campaign. They concluded that majority of advertisements does not reflect reality and that the image of women in advertisements is significant in influencing women’s perception of themselves. Great advertisers consider not only the attention- getting power of an advertisement or commercial, but also what kind of emotional response it provokes in customers.

• Why do designer use sexual images of women and not men ?
• Who are the target audience for these ads?
Magazine’s choose carefully when picking images for magazine because for a man some images does not provoke the kind of anxiety that it may do in many women. The media is guilty of sexism in their coverage of celebrities. You will see more advert and cover of women then men.

• Talking about Cosmopolitan

Cosmopolitan that is a prime example of using sexual images and even talks about sexual issues to sell their magazine is the cosmopolitan. The cosmopolitan first published in 1886 in the United States as a family magazine, was later transformed into a literary magazine and eventually became a women's magazine in the late 1960s. Also known as Cosmo, its current content includes articles on relationships and sex, health, careers, self-improvement, celebrities, as well as fashion and beauty. Paul Schlicht told his first-issue readers that his publication was a "first-class family magazine", adding, "There will be a department devoted exclusively to the interests of women, with articles on fashions, on household decoration, on cooking, and the care and management of children, etc., also a department for the younger members of the family." If you look at the cosmopolitan, all you see slashed across the pages is sex ,sex ,sex and even more sex. The cosmopolitan has turned it back on everyday family issues and started to focus on what the everyday reader wants, sex! Going through a cosmopolitan magazine their isn’t a real different between the issues they cover to the issues a men magazine called nuts covers. The magazine borrows some of its dirty glamour and sense of danger, while in return it confers legitimacy, making sex a topic of interest and discussion like any other day activity.

• Talking about Nuts magazine

Action plan
Need to be done

4 comments:

  1. Hi Saskay,

    There’s a lot in here and I can see that you’re working hard on this, which is good. You do need to finesse it quite a lot for Friday. But it’s do-able!

    Firstly, you need to settle on a question or title for your proposal. It’s fine if it changes when you start to do the research. What about sthg like: ‘Sex sells: analysing the use of the sexualised female form in fashion magazines’
    Be clear that you are talking about the advertising that appears IN magazines, not how magazines are advertised. This is a bit unclear at the moment.

    Be clear whether it is advertising ONLY that you are looking at. It sounds as if you are going to count the amount of images in the articles as well – which is slightly different. You need to be precise.

    The mags that you have chosen to look at are both highly sexualised. Not all publications are. You need to be mindful of the genre of magazines you are looking at. If you looked at the Spectator it would be quite a different story. Not all magazines are interested in this and so you need to set your context carefully.
    I think a comparison will be tricky between male and female orientated mags, as they exist for very different reasons and the images are trying to do different things. Nuts is basically porn-lite. Cosmo is a girl’s lifestyle mag.

    I think it would make more sense to look at a wider range of women’s mags (either fashion / lifestyle) and analyse which are worse offenders/look for any variation.

    Please can you come in and see me for a tutorial tomorrow? I’d like to spend more time on this with you. After 11.30am is best.

    Cheers,
    Catherine

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hiya, I've got a book that I think would be useful for your piece its called, "was it good for you, too? 30 years of Cosmopolitan" by Linda Kelsey (Robson Books, 2003) Its got loads about the representation of sex in Cosmo. I'm afraid I wont be able to bring it in before friday but they might have it in the library or I could lend it to you after summer.
    Daisy

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Saskay,

    I agree with Catherine - I think you need to really, really narrow it down much more - 4,500 words is not a lot. Either focus on 'Lads' or 'Womens' magazines of the same type. Maybe look at a specific shelf in WH Smiths and compare and contrast.

    You also need to decide a few things:
    Is it's about the use of sex or about sexism? They are different things.

    Is is about magazine design or advertising that's found inside a magazine? The adverts aren't designed by the magazine designers - they're designed by ad agencies.

    You need to decide on your opinion/standpoint on the use of sex and stick to it. Why is it bad? Why is it good? etc... It could be a neutral opinion, a for opinion or an against opinion - whichever you choose or believe is fine as long as you can find stuff to back up and prove your argument from a consistent standpoint.

    Maybe you could deal with the history in some sort of graphic timeline with key illustrations/images to highlight important or significant issues and when they occurred.

    It's all about narrowing and focusing - maybe you need to think of some sort of practical thing that a designer could do after reading your report? What would they be able to learn from reading it and how wold that change the way they laid out a magazine cover or spread?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi again Saskay,

    It was a good session today - you made real progress!

    Notes that I took were broadly:

    1) You are mainly interested in looking at a comparative analysis of sexualised imagery of both women and men in youth lifestyle magazines.

    2) You will do this by having a first chapter which briefly looks at the history of the the emergance of sexualised imagery in magazines, and sets the context of feminism and post-feminism. You will define what you mean by sexualised imagery and include some egs.

    3) You will then go on to visually deconstruct and comparatively analyse an issue of Cosmopolitan and an issue of Nuts magazines. [You may want to look at them over a period of 3 issues to add more rigour). You will also consider the demographic of each. You will do some info design of the results of your analysis. Questions to consider are numbers of men/women featured/breakdown of editorial content/what the images are being used to do.

    4) The report will possibly conclude with a series of considerations for magazine editors.

    You also mentioned looking at Marie Claire back issues about portrayal of women a few yrs ago... dig these out - they will help you write your abstract!

    Catherine

    ReplyDelete